IPR Newsletter – Architectural Designs and Intellectual Property Protection : February 2025

Introduction to Architectural Design Protection In the world of architecture, intellectual property protection is crucial for safeguarding the creative and artistic efforts of designers and architects. The intricate designs that breathe life into our cities are protected under various legal framewor...
Read More

IPR Newsletter – Recognising the Performers Right: A Deep Look at Deepfake and Performer Rights : December 2024

Deepfake The creation and manipulation of digital information has been completely transformed by the introduction of deepfake technology. Artificial intelligence and machine learning algorithms enable deepfakes to create incredibly lifelike voice, video, and photos of people. Although there are many...
Read More

IPR Newsletter – BATTLE FOR AN ICONIC LOGO – How the Delhi High Court Resolved the Two-Decade Long ‘Lacoste v. Crocodile International’ Impasse : October 2024

Introduction Lacoste & Anr. v. Crocodile International Pte Ltd is a significant trademark dispute adjudicated by the Delhi High Court. The plaintiffs, Lacoste, a well-known French apparel brand, filed a lawsuit against Crocodile International Pte Ltd and its Indian counterpart. Lacoste alleged t...
Read More

IPR Newsletter – A Collision Course – Understanding Tussle Between Copyright Laws And OpenAI : September 2024

Introduction As generative AI technologies enter the market, their use raises substantial legal concerns under current copyright laws. Courts are now deciding how to apply these standards to AI-generated content, including issues like infringement, usage rights, and the ambiguity of AI-generated wor...
Read More

IPR Newsletter – Who’s the Real King? – An Analysis of Burger King V. Anahita Irani : August 2024

Introduction The 13-year-old legal dispute between the international fast-food giant Burger King Corporation, headquartered in the United States, and Pune’s cherished Burger King has concluded with Burger King winning. The multinational’s petition was denied by the commercial court of Pu...
Read More